Does
Industry Funding Deserve a Bad Rap?
by Tori DeAngelis
"Partnering with industry--though
it can be lucrative--can challenge scientific reporting
and exchange. Psychologists and universities are
learning ways to negotiate this increasingly common
relationship."
|
National
Science Foundation report: Science and Technology:
Public Attitudes and Public Understanding
"Although Americans express
a high level of interest in S&T, they lack
confidence in their knowledge of these subjects.
In 2001, less than 15 percent thought that they
were well informed about S&T. In addition,
few Americans follow news stories about scientific
breakthroughs, research, and exploration. Those
with more years of formal education and those
who have taken more courses in science and mathematics
are more likely than others to express a high
level of interest in S&T and to believe
that they are well informed."
|
|
CDC
Toolkit: the Federal Trough
by Jim Austin
"When it comes to finding funding for scientific research
in the United States, most people think first about the National
Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health
(NIH)--and for good reason. NIH sponsors a huge amount of
research into science related to human health and disease,
and NSF supports more researchers in basic science than anyone
else does."
|
The Economics of Science: Interview with Terence Kealey
by JR Minkel
"After months of delay and uncertainty, the US Congress
finished work on the 2003 US budget in February, approving
large spending increases for the NSF and NIH. Science advocates
worry that 2004 could see a dramatically smaller boost. But
would science necessarily suffer if government spending stopped
rising? No, says Terrance Kealey, a clinical bio-chemist and
vice-chancellor of the University of Buckingham in England."
|