for our e-mail list for updates and socially responsible
1015 18th St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Tel: 202 429-8900
Fax: 202 429-8905
Biology and Security
Instant Event Idea
Mission: Impossible II
Ex-IMF agent Sean Ambrose (Dougray Scott) has
stolen the antidote for a deadly disease known as Chimera and is
blackmailing the boss of the pharmaceutical company that has the
disease. Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise), along with some IMF colleagues
and an international thief named Nyah Nordoff-Hall (Thandie Newton),
must try to get the antidote back and destroy the disease.
Ethan develops a love interest with Nyah but must use her to infiltrate
the villains, as she is the ex-lover of Ambrose. When Nyah contracts
the deadly virus, the race is on to not only stop the villains,
but also save Nyah's life. (link
to online movie summary)
Suggested Ethical Questions for Discussion:
1. This movie centers around the "dual-use dilemma"--the
ability to use important research towards disastrous ends. The killer
virus was necessary to develop the "super vaccine"--was
the risk worth it?
2. Another problem with the vaccine's creation was its corporate
nature, since it was made by "Biocyte Pharmaceuticals".
Should corporations be allowed to create such dangerous viruses,
given the chance of theft? If so, how should they be policed? If
not, how would we be sure they were following the law?
3. Ethan Hunt's job as a covert operative is flashy and stylized,
but the use of covert operatives in halting terrorism is very real.
Should we strike with operatives first, or only as a last resort?
Is there any room for diplomacy or negotiation in a situation like
4. In this movie, the United States does most of the work in stopping
the virus's release. Is this policy appropriate, considering the
planned release on foreign land? Should the U.S. have a free ticket
to act against terrorism worldwide? If not, what would have to be
done to allow international cooperation? How would we know that
other countries were not supporting the terrorists?
5. The fact that the main villain betrayed the IMF raises questions
about who to trust. Every year, weapons become more powerful and
secrets become more important, making the danger of one traitor
even greater. Should the government have more power to watch suspected
traitors and terrorists? Who decides who should be watched? How
can we prevent abuse of this power?